Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023CN0034

Case C-34/23, Getin Noble Bank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie (Poland) lodged on 24 January 2023 — RF v Getin Noble Bank S.A.

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023, p. 30–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.5.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/30


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie (Poland) lodged on 24 January 2023 — RF v Getin Noble Bank S.A.

(Case C-34/23, Getin Noble Bank)

(2023/C 155/38)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RF

Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.

Question referred

Does the prohibition laid down in Article 70(1) Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council, relate only to the possibility of securing a pecuniary claim by way of enforcement or also to the institution of any proceedings to secure claims in relation to an entity under special resolution?


(1)  OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190.


Top