Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CA0101

Case C-101/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 May 2023 — European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium (Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 169 — Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 — Article 170(3) — Paragraph 23 of Annex I — Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender — Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons)

OJ C 223, 26.6.2023, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

26.6.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/4


Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 May 2023 — European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium

(Case C-101/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 169 - Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 - Article 170(3) - Paragraph 23 of Annex I - Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender - Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons)

(2023/C 223/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, M. Ilkova and O. Verheecke, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium (represented by: L. Masson and G. Tilman, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.


Top