Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CA0757

    Case C-757/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023 — Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (Appeal — Authentication of a judgment by the General Court — Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Copy of the judgment to be served — Signature of the judges — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of pricing — Concept of infringement ‘by object’ — European Commission’s burden of proof — Statements of undertakings — Reliability — Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct — Single and continuous infringement — Fine — Calculation of the basic amount — Sales to be taken into account — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction)

    OJ C 321, 11.9.2023, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.9.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 321/6


    Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023 — Nichicon Corporation v European Commission

    (Case C-757/21 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Authentication of a judgment by the General Court - Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Copy of the judgment to be served - Signature of the judges - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of pricing - Concept of infringement ‘by object’ - European Commission’s burden of proof - Statements of undertakings - Reliability - Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct - Single and continuous infringement - Fine - Calculation of the basic amount - Sales to be taken into account - Mitigating circumstances - Unlimited jurisdiction)

    (2023/C 321/06)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Nichicon Corporation (represented by: A. Ablasser-Neuhuber, G. Fussenegger, H. Kühnert and F. Neumayr, Rechtsanwälte)

    Other party: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, T. Franchoo, C. Sjödin and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders Nichicon Corporation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.


    (1)   OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.


    Top