This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CA0653
Case C-653/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 45(1) — Promotion — Decision not to promote an official — Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons)
Case C-653/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 45(1) — Promotion — Decision not to promote an official — Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons)
Case C-653/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 45(1) — Promotion — Decision not to promote an official — Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons)
OJ C 35, 30.1.2023, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 35/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti
(Case C-653/20 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 45(1) - Promotion - Decision not to promote an official - Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Duty to state reasons)
(2023/C 35/05)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: Guillaume Vincenti (represented by: H. Tettenborn, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs. |