Šis dokuments ir izvilkums no tīmekļa vietnes EUR-Lex.
Dokuments 62018CN0374
Case C-374/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2018 — UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG
Case C-374/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2018 — UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG
Case C-374/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2018 — UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG
OJ C 328, 17.9.2018., 26.–27. lpp.
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.9.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 328/26 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2018 — UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG
(Case C-374/18)
(2018/C 328/34)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Köln
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V.
Defendant: Deutsche Post AG
Questions referred
|
1. |
Is Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that that provision permits exceptions from Articles 5 to 9 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 only in the event that a vehicle of a universal service provider within the meaning of Article 2(13) of Directive 97/67/EC (2) transports solely and exclusively items forming part of the universal service, in accordance with Article 13(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, or are exceptions from Articles 5 to 9 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 also permissible under that provision in the case where the vehicles concerned, in addition to transporting items forming part of the universal service, also carry items that do not come under the universal service? |
|
2. |
If the answer to Question 1 is that exceptions from Articles 5 to 9 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 are also permissible in the case where the vehicles concerned, in addition to transporting items forming part of the universal service, also carry other items that do not come under the universal service:
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
Is an item’s classification as an item forming part of the universal service in accordance with Directive 97/67/EC precluded where, in connection with that item, add-on services such as:
are offered? |
(1) Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (Text with EEA relevance) — Declaration (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1).
(2) Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ 1998 L 15, p. 14).