EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0372
Case C-372/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2016 — Soha Sahyouni v Raja Mamisch
Case C-372/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2016 — Soha Sahyouni v Raja Mamisch
Case C-372/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2016 — Soha Sahyouni v Raja Mamisch
OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 33–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.9.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 343/33 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2016 — Soha Sahyouni v Raja Mamisch
(Case C-372/16)
(2016/C 343/45)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberlandesgericht München
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Soha Sahyouni
Defendant: Raja Mamisch
Questions referred
1. |
Does the scope of Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 (1) of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (OJ 2010 L 343, p. 10), as defined in Article 1 of that regulation, also include cases of private divorce, in this instance one pronounced by unilateral declaration of a spouse before a religious court in Syria on the basis of sharia? |
2. |
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: In applying Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 [when examining] Article 10 thereof in cases of private divorce,
|
3. |
If the answer to Question 2(2) is in the affirmative: Does the fact that the spouse discriminated against consents to the divorce — including by duly accepting compensation — itself constitute a ground for not applying that rule? |