EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0346
Case T-346/15: Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Bank Tejarat v Council
Case T-346/15: Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Bank Tejarat v Council
Case T-346/15: Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Bank Tejarat v Council
OJ C 302, 14.9.2015, p. 62–63
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 302/62 |
Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Bank Tejarat v Council
(Case T-346/15)
(2015/C 302/77)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Bank Tejarat (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy, A. Meskarian, Solicitors, M. Brindle, QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/556 of 7 April 2015 amending Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 101), insofar as it applies to the applicant; |
— |
annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/549 of 7 April 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 12), insofar as it applies to the applicant; |
— |
order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs for this procedure. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a violation of article 266 TFEU
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a violation of the principle of res judicata
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging a violation of the right to effective judicial protection
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging a violation of the rights to good administration
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging a violation of the right to the respect of reputation and the right of property:
|
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reason
|
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment
|