Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0262

    Case C-262/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 1 June 2015 — GD European Land Systems — Steyr GmbH

    OJ C 294, 7.9.2015, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.9.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 294/22


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 1 June 2015 — GD European Land Systems — Steyr GmbH

    (Case C-262/15)

    (2015/C 294/27)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Verwaltungsgerichtshof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: GD European Land Systems — Steyr GmbH

    Respondent authority: Zollamt Eisenstadt Flughafen Wien

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does the exception specified in point (c) of note 1 to Chapter 93 of the Combined Nomenclature (Part II of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013) (2), which is worded ‘armoured fighting vehicles (heading 8710)’, apply also to ‘parts thereof’?

    2.

    Must note 3 to Section XVII of the Combined Nomenclature be interpreted as meaning that a ‘weapons station (armoured turret)’ which may be used on armoured fighting vehicles or on ‘mobile maritime transport systems’ or in stationary installations must be classified under heading 8710 as a part of an armoured fighting vehicle because that weapons station was imported by the manufacturer of armoured fighting vehicles for the production or assembly of armoured fighting vehicles and is used in fact for that purpose?


    (1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

    (2)  OJ 2013 L 290, p. 1.


    Top