Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0700

    Case T-700/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2017 — TV1 v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of integrated audiovisual production, dissemination and archiving services — Rejection of the tender of one tenderer — Contract awarded to another tenderer — Offer abnormally low — Obligation to request further clarification — Obligation to state reasons — Transparency — Equal treatment and non-discrimination — Manifest error of assessment)

    OJ C 78, 13.3.2017, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.3.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 78/19


    Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2017 — TV1 v Commission

    (Case T-700/14) (1)

    ((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Supply of integrated audiovisual production, dissemination and archiving services - Rejection of the tender of one tenderer - Contract awarded to another tenderer - Offer abnormally low - Obligation to request further clarification - Obligation to state reasons - Transparency - Equal treatment and non-discrimination - Manifest error of assessment))

    (2017/C 078/25)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: TV1 GmbH (Unterföhring, Germany) (represented by: C. Scherer–Leydecker, J. Mey and A. Rausch, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Moro and M. Noll-Ehlers initially, then F. Moro and T. Maxian Rusche and, lastly, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Katsimerou, Agents)

    Re:

    Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant for Lot No. 4, entitled ‘streaming, compression, hosting and content delivery’ in the call for tenders bearing reference PO/2014 — 03/A4 and concerning ‘[i]ntegrated audiovisual production, dissemination and archiving services’, of the decision by which the Commission awarded that lot to the successful tenderer and of the contract for the supply of services concluded between the Commission and the successful tenderer.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders TV1 GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.


    Top