Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CA0182

    Case C-182/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT — Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 — Likelihood of confusion)

    OJ C 155, 11.5.2015, p. 6–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.5.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 155/6


    Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    (Case C-182/14 P) (1)

    ((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 - Likelihood of confusion))

    (2015/C 155/07)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, Rechtsanwälte)

    Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1)

    Sets aside paragraph 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Mega Brands v OHIM — Diset (MAGNEXT) (T-604/11 and T-292/12, EU:T:2014:56);

    2)

    Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

    3)

    Reserves the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.


    Top