Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011TN0139

    Case T-139/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Gnango v Council

    OJ C 130, 30.4.2011, p. 23–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.4.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 130/23

    Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Gnango v Council

    (Case T-139/11)

    2011/C 130/44

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Loba Emmanuel Patrice Gnango (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Loba Emmanuel Patrice GNANGO, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,

    —

    consequently,

    —

    annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;

    —

    alternatively, order that the name of Mr Loba Emmanuel Patrice GNANGO be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.

    Top