This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FN0079
Case F-79/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission
Case F-79/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission
Case F-79/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission
OJ C 301, 6.11.2010, p. 66–66
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.11.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/66 |
Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission
(Case F-79/10)
()
2010/C 301/107
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Charles Dubus (Tervuren, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST4/C under the 2009 promotion exercise and application for compensation for non-material damage suffered
Form of order sought
— |
annul the Commission’s decision, published on 20 November 2009, not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted from grade AST3/4 to grade AST4/C under the 2009 promotion exercise; |
— |
as a consequence of that annulment, undertake a further comparative examination of the applicant’s merits and those of the other candidates under the 2009 promotion exercise and promote the applicant to grade AST4C with retroactive effect from 1 January 2009 together with the payment of interest on the arrears of pay at the rate applied by the European Central Bank in its main refinancing operations, from 1 January 2009, increased by 2 points, without however challenging the promotion of the other officials promoted and whose names appear on the list published on 20 November 2009; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 3 500 compensation for non-material damage suffered as a result of the fact that he was not promoted on 1 January 2009, without prejudice to any increase during the proceedings; |
— |
order the European Commission to pay the costs. |