Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CN0372

    Case C-372/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II (Republic of Poland), lodged on 26 July 2010 — Pak-Holdco Sp zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

    OJ C 288, 23.10.2010, p. 20–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.10.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 288/20


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II (Republic of Poland), lodged on 26 July 2010 — Pak-Holdco Sp zoo v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

    (Case C-372/10)

    ()

    (2010/C 288/34)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, Izba Finansowa, Wydział II

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Pak-Holdco Sp zoo

    Respondent: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu

    Questions referred

    1.

    In interpreting Article 7(1) of Directive 69/335/EEC, (1) must a national court take account of the provisions of amending directives, in particular Directives 73/79/EEC (2) and 73/80/EEC, (3) even though those directives were no longer in force when the Republic of Poland acceded to the European Union?

    2.

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the exclusion of the assets of a capital company from the amount on which capital duty is charged, as laid down in the first indent of Article 5(3) of Directive 69/335/EEC, concern only the assets of a capital company which has had an increase in capital?


    (1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1969(II), p. 412.

    (2)  OJ 1973 L 103, p. 13.

    (3)  OJ 1973 L 103, p. 15.


    Top