EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CN0114

Case C-114/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels lodged on 3 March 2010 — Belpolis Benelux SA v Belgische Staat

OJ C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.5.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/22


Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels lodged on 3 March 2010 — Belpolis Benelux SA v Belgische Staat

(Case C-114/10)

2010/C 134/33

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Belpolis Benelux SA

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Question referred

1.

Does Community law, in particular the principle of the freedom to provide services as laid down in Article 56 TFEU, preclude rules such as those laid down in Articles 1 and 1a of Belgian Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970, under which the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) may be applied to construction work only if the service provider is registered in Belgium as a contractor in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Wetboek van Inkomstenbelastingen (Belgian Income Tax Code) 1992?

2.

Do the provisions contained in Article 1 and 1a of Royal Decree No 20 of 20 July 1970 contravene the principle of fiscal neutrality and/or the general Community law principle of equal treatment by allowing the reduced rate of VAT (6 %) on construction work to apply only if the service provider is registered as a contractor in Belgium in accordance with Articles 400 and 401 of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992?


Top