This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CJ0479
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2009.#French Republic v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 - Definition of the concept of drift nets - ‘Thonaille’ - Duty to state reasons - Infringement of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.#Case C-479/07.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2009.
French Republic v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 - Definition of the concept of drift nets - ‘Thonaille’ - Duty to state reasons - Infringement of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.
Case C-479/07.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2009.
French Republic v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 - Definition of the concept of drift nets - ‘Thonaille’ - Duty to state reasons - Infringement of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.
Case C-479/07.
European Court Reports 2009 I-00024*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2009:131
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2009 – France v Council
(Case C‑479/07)
Action for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 – Definition of the concept of drift nets – ‘Thonaille’ – Duty to state reasons – Infringement of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination
1. Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – Technical conservation measures – Prohibition on pelagic driftnets more than 2.5 kilometres long (Council Regulation No 809/2007) (see paras 36-38, 43-45)
2. Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 49-54)
3. Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – Technical conservation measures – Prohibition on pelagic driftnets more than 2.5 kilometres long (Council Regulation No 809/2007) (see paras 63-70)
Re:
Action for annulment – Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 809/2007 of 28 June 2007 amending Regulations (EC) No 894/97, (EC) No 812/2004 and (EC) No 2187/2005 as concerns drift nets (OJ 2007 L 182, p. 1) – Concept of ‘drift nets’ – Inclusion in that concept of stabilised nets such as the ‘thonaille’ – Infringement of the obligation to provide reasons and of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the French Republic to pay the costs; |
3. |
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs. |