(1)

On 4 April 2006, the Commission received a complaint concerning the alleged injurious dumping of imports of certain camera systems originating in Japan.

(2)

The complaint was lodged by Grass Valley Nederland BV acting on behalf of Community producers representing a major proportion of the total Community production of certain camera systems pursuant to Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.

(3)

The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of dumping and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding.

(4)

The Commission, by a notice (notice of initiation) published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), accordingly initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain camera systems, currently falling within CN codes ex 8525 80 19, ex 8528 49 35, ex 8528 49 91, ex 8528 59 90, ex 8529 90 92, ex 8529 90 97, ex 8537 10 91, ex 8537 10 99 and 8543 70 90 (CN codes since 1 January 2007) and originating in Japan.

(5)

The notice of initiation defined the product certain camera systems originating in Japan consisting of:

Imported either together or separately, and originating in Japan.

It is not always required that the camera systems consist of all the above components.

The abovementioned different components (not camera head) of a camera system cannot function separately and cannot be used outside the camera system of a particular producer.

Lenses and recorders which are not in the same housing with a camera head are not covered by the product.

The product concerned is susceptible for use in broadcast, news gathering, digital cinematography or professional applications. Professional applications include (but are not limited to) the use of these systems for creating educational, entertainment, promotional and documentary video material, both for internal and external distribution.

(6)

The product covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 (3), i.e. television camera systems originating in Japan, currently falling within CN codes ex 8525 80 19, ex 8528 49 35, ex 8528 49 91, ex 8528 59 90, ex 8529 90 92, ex 8529 90 97, ex 8537 10 91, ex 8537 10 99 and 8543 70 90 (CN codes since 1 January 2007) falls entirely within the above product definition. In December 2006, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1910/2006 (4) confirmed these measures further to an expiry review in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (the original measures). The original measures are dealt with in a parallel Council Regulation (EC) No 906/2007 (5).

(7)

The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers and associations of importers or exporters known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting country, users, consumer organisations and the complainant Community producers of the initiation of the investigation. Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation and questionnaires were sent to all parties concerned.

(8)

By a letter of 12 April 2007 addressed to the Commission, Grass Valley Nederland B.V. formally withdrew its complaint.

(9)

In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn, unless such termination would not be in the Community interest.

(10)

The Commission considered that the present proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any considerations showing that such termination would not be in the Community interest. Interested parties were informed accordingly and were given the opportunity to comment. No comments were received indicating that such termination would not be in the Community interest.

(11)

The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain camera systems originating in Japan should be terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures.

(12)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee,