EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0015
Case C-15/23 P: Appeal brought on 17 January 2023 by Arne-Patrik Heinze against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 November 2022 in Case T-610/21, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Heinze (K K WATER)
Case C-15/23 P: Appeal brought on 17 January 2023 by Arne-Patrik Heinze against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 November 2022 in Case T-610/21, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Heinze (K K WATER)
Case C-15/23 P: Appeal brought on 17 January 2023 by Arne-Patrik Heinze against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 November 2022 in Case T-610/21, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Heinze (K K WATER)
OJ C 223, 26.6.2023, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.6.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 223/10 |
Appeal brought on 17 January 2023 by Arne-Patrik Heinze against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 November 2022 in Case T-610/21, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Heinze (K K WATER)
(Case C-15/23 P)
(2023/C 223/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Arne-Patrik Heinze (represented by: N. Dauskardt, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: L'Oréal, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 11 May 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Mr Arne-Patrik Heinze should bear his own costs.