EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0780
Case T-780/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-780/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-780/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 35, 30.1.2023, p. 57–57
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 35/57 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC)
(Case T-780/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 35/68)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: Lila Rossa Engros SRL (Voluntari, Romania) (represented by: O. Anghel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 September 2021 (Case R 441/2021-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Lila Rossa Engros SRL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |