Action brought on 1 July 2022 — QF v Council

(Case T-386/22)

(2022/C 318/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: QF (represented by: T. Marembert and A. Bass, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment. The applicant submits, first, that none of the Council’s items of evidence meets the requirements of the European case-law in terms of the standard and quality of the evidence and, second, that none of the assertions of the Council’s statement of reasons is established. Lastly, the applicant puts forward, in support of her plea, elements of a financial nature, which make it possible to establish that the Council’s reasoning is incorrect.

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3).