This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CB0716
Case C-716/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition — Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-716/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition — Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-716/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition — Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 44, 8.2.2021, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.2.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 44/10 |
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA
(Case C-716/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition - Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 44/14)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET
Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid (Commercial Court No 2, Madrid, Spain) by decision of 29 July 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.