This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0646
Case T-646/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-646/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-646/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/11 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e)
(Case T-646/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark e - Earlier international figurative mark e - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 247/17)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gerhard Gröpel (Passau, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 (Case R 223/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Gröpel and eSky Group IP.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |