Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62018TN0466

Case T-466/18: Action brought on 25 July 2018 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology)

OJ C 341, 24.9.2018, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.9.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/25

Action brought on 25 July 2018 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology)

(Case T-466/18)

(2018/C 341/36)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Argyriadis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration in the European Union of the figurative colour mark ‘EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology’ representing a combination of the following colours: green and black — Application for registration No 16 180 821

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2018 in Case R 1359/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—

hold this action to be admissible;

—

annul the contested decision;

—

uphold in its entirety the application No 16 180 821 for trade mark registration in the European Union with respect to all the claimed goods;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001;

—

Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Top