Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0305

    Case T-305/18: Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council

    OJ C 240, 9.7.2018, p. 54–54 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806220471970572018/C 240/633052018TC24020180709EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180516545411

    Case T-305/18: Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council

    Top

    C2402018EN5410120180516EN0063541541

    Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council

    (Case T-305/18)

    2018/C 240/63Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Andriy Klyuyev (Donetsk, Ukraine) (represented by: B. Kennelly, QC, J. Pobjoy, Barrister, R Gherson and T. Garner, Solicitors)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should annul:

    —

    Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 48), and

    —

    Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 5),

    insofar as those measures apply to the applicant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging that the Council made errors of assessment in considering that the criterion for listing the applicant in Article 1(1) of the contested decision and Article 3(1) of the contested regulation is satisfied.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging that the violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6, read with Articles 2 and 3, TEU, and Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by the Council’s assumption that the Applicant’s treatment in Ukraine complied with fundamental human rights.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging that the Council violated the applicant’s rights of defence and the right to good administration and effective judicial protection.

    4.

    Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed, without justification or proportion, the applicant’s rights to property and reputation.
    Top