Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TB0470

    Case T-470/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (senso tek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark senso tek — Earlier EU figurative mark SENSOTEC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    OJ C 240, 9.7.2018, p. 45–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806220701970632018/C 240/514702017TC24020180709EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180515454511

    Case T-470/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (senso tek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark senso tek — Earlier EU figurative mark SENSOTEC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    Top

    C2402018EN4510120180515EN0051451451

    Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (senso tek)

    (Case T-470/17) ( 1 )

    ‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark senso tek — Earlier EU figurative mark SENSOTEC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’

    2018/C 240/51Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Sensotek GmbH (Reichenbach an der Fils, Germany) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Senso Tecnologie Srl (Rome, Italy)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2017 (Case R 1953/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Senso Tecnologie and Sensotek.

    Operative part of the order

    The Court:

    1)

    Dismisses the action;

    2)

    Orders Sensotek GmbH to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

    Top