Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0024

    Case C-24/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 January 2018 — István Bán v KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács

    OJ C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201806080451931552018/C 221/02242018CJC22120180625EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL201801082211

    Case C-24/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 January 2018 — István Bán v KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács

    Top

    C2212018EN210120180108EN00022121

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 January 2018 — István Bán v KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács

    (Case C-24/18)

    2018/C 221/02Language of the case: Hungarian

    Referring court

    Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: István Bán

    Defendants: KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács

    Question referred

    Must national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which rights of use created over land used for agricultural or forestry activities are extinguished ex lege, without any financial compensation, where a new owner acquires, in the context of enforcement proceedings, the immovable property subject to the right of use and where the land user has not obtained, in relation to that land, aid for agricultural or rural development that is funded by the European Union or the national budget and that is subject to the obligation of using the land for a certain period of time as established by law, be regarded as a restriction contrary to Articles 49 and 63 TFEU?

    Top