EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0392

Case T-392/17: Action brought on 14 June 2017 — TE v Commission

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017, p. 36–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.9.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/36


Action brought on 14 June 2017 — TE v Commission

(Case T-392/17)

(2017/C 293/45)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: TE (represented by: J. Bartončík, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

annul the decision to open an investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging breach of a basic principle of EU law — the principle of subsidiarity.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle ne bis in idem.


Top