EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0423

Case T-423/16: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — De Masi v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council — Response to initial requests after an equitable arrangement — No confirmatory decision — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017, p. 32–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.9.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/32


Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — De Masi v Commission

(Case T-423/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the work of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’ set up by the Council - Response to initial requests after an equitable arrangement - No confirmatory decision - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 293/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, Professor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Baquero Cruz and F. Erlbacher, then J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the Commission’s decisions allegedly contained, first, in the letter of 20 May 2016, and second, in the letter of 13 July 2016, responding to the requests for access to the documents of the ‘Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation)’, submitted by the applicant on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order

1)

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2)

Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.


(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.


Top