Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TB0323

    Case T-323/13: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Pure Fishing v EUIPO — Łabowicz (NANOFIL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NANOFIL — Invalidity of the earlier EU figurative mark NANO — No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 144, 8.5.2017, p. 42–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.5.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 144/42


    Order of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Pure Fishing v EUIPO — Łabowicz (NANOFIL)

    (Case T-323/13) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark NANOFIL - Invalidity of the earlier EU figurative mark NANO - No need to adjudicate))

    (2017/C 144/57)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Pure Fishing (Spirit Lake, Iowa, United States) (represented by: J. Dickerson, solicitor)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Edward Łabowicz (Kłodzko, Poland) (represented by: M. Żygadło, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2013 (Case R 1241/2012-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Łabowicz and Pure Fishing.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

    2.

    The parties shall bear their own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.


    Top