EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0336
Case T-336/15: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2017 — Windrush Aka v EUIPO — Dammers (The Specials) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark — Article 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-336/15: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2017 — Windrush Aka v EUIPO — Dammers (The Specials) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark — Article 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-336/15: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2017 — Windrush Aka v EUIPO — Dammers (The Specials) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark The Specials — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark — Article 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 144, 8.5.2017, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.5.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 144/37 |
Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2017 — Windrush Aka v EUIPO — Dammers (The Specials)
(Case T-336/15) (1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark The Specials - Genuine use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark - Article 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2017/C 144/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Windrush Aka LLP (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and S. Britton, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Jerry Dammers (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Fehler, Solicitor, H. Cuddigan and B. Brandreth, Barristers).
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2015 (Case R 1412/2014-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Windrush Aka and Mr Dammers.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Windrush Aka LLP to pay the costs. |