This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0318
Case T-318/16: Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-444S)
Case T-318/16: Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-444S)
Case T-318/16: Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-444S)
OJ C 287, 8.8.2016, p. 31–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.8.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 287/31 |
Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-444S)
(Case T-318/16)
(2016/C 287/38)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Parties
Applicant: Moravia Consulting spol. s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citizen Systems Europe GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SDC-444S’– Application for registration No 12 780 061
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 in Case R 1573/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95. |