This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0178
Case T-178/16: Action brought on 22 April 2016 — Policolor v EUIPO — CWS-Lackfabrik Conrad W. Schmidt (Policolor)
Case T-178/16: Action brought on 22 April 2016 — Policolor v EUIPO — CWS-Lackfabrik Conrad W. Schmidt (Policolor)
Case T-178/16: Action brought on 22 April 2016 — Policolor v EUIPO — CWS-Lackfabrik Conrad W. Schmidt (Policolor)
OJ C 211, 13.6.2016, p. 65–65
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 211/65 |
Action brought on 22 April 2016 — Policolor v EUIPO — CWS-Lackfabrik Conrad W. Schmidt (Policolor)
(Case T-178/16)
(2016/C 211/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Policolor SA (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: M. Comanescu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CWS-Lackfabrik Conrad W. Schmidt GmbH & Co. KG (Düren-Merken, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Policolor’ — Application for registration No 10 277 176
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2016 in Case R 346/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
alter the contested decision in its entirety; |
— |
in consequence, annul the contested decision; |
— |
annul the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 16 December 2014 in opposition No B 1 991 457; |
— |
dismiss the opposition made by the intervener with regard to the registration of the European Union trade mark No 10 277 176; |
— |
order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred during the procedure before the Board of Appeal. |
Pleas in law
— |
Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
— |
Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation No. 2015/2424. |