Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TN0031

    Case T-31/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel)

    OJ C 106, 21.3.2016, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.3.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 106/41


    Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel)

    (Case T-31/16)

    (2016/C 106/48)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Juwel’ — Application for registration No 12 426 888

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2015 in Case R 2571/2014-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    Neither Article 7(1)(b) nor Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 is applicable.


    Top