This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TB0329
Case T-329/15: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2015 — Certuss Dampfautomaten v OHIM — Universal for Engineering Industries (Universal 1800 TC) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceeding — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-329/15: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2015 — Certuss Dampfautomaten v OHIM — Universal for Engineering Industries (Universal 1800 TC) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceeding — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-329/15: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2015 — Certuss Dampfautomaten v OHIM — Universal for Engineering Industries (Universal 1800 TC) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceeding — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 61–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/61 |
Order of the General Court of 17 November 2015 — Certuss Dampfautomaten v OHIM — Universal for Engineering Industries (Universal 1800 TC)
(Case T-329/15) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceeding - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 038/82)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Sroka, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Universal for Engineering Industries SAE (Giza, Egypt)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2015 (Case R 1303/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Universal for Engineering Industries SAE and Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal. |
|
2. |
Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |