Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0556

    Case C-556/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 28 October 2015 — Fondul Proprietatea SA v Societatea Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA (CE Oltenia)

    OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.2.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 38/22


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 28 October 2015 — Fondul Proprietatea SA v Societatea Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA (CE Oltenia)

    (Case C-556/15)

    (2016/C 038/32)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Curtea de Apel Craiova

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant and appellant: Fondul Proprietatea SA

    Defendant and respondent: Societatea Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA (CE Oltenia)

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 107 TFEU be interpreted as meaning that the participation of the Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA in the capital of the project company Hidro Tarnița SA, whose object is to construct and operate the Tarnița-Lăpuștești hydroelectric power station, constitutes State aid to the producers of wind and photovoltaic energy in that the declared aim of the project is to guarantee optimal conditions for the installation of greater capacity in the power stations which produce those types of energy, that is to say: (i) is it a measure financed by the State or through State resources, (ii) is it selective in nature, and (iii) can it affect trade between the Member States?

    2.

    If the answer is in the affirmative, was such State aid subject to the notification [obligation] laid down in Article 108(3) TFEU?


    Top