This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52013DP0021
European Parliament decision of 17 January 2013 on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (COM(2011)0753 — C7-0445/2011 — 2011/0368(COD) — (2013/2505(RSP))
European Parliament decision of 17 January 2013 on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (COM(2011)0753 — C7-0445/2011 — 2011/0368(COD) — (2013/2505(RSP))
European Parliament decision of 17 January 2013 on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (COM(2011)0753 — C7-0445/2011 — 2011/0368(COD) — (2013/2505(RSP))
OJ C 440, 30.12.2015, p. 276–301
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.12.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 440/276 |
P7_TA(2013)0021
Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (Decision on the opening of interinstitutional negotiations)
European Parliament decision of 17 January 2013 on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (COM(2011)0753 — C7-0445/2011 — 2011/0368(COD) — (2013/2505(RSP))
(2015/C 440/31)
The European Parliament,
— |
having regard to the proposal of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, |
— |
having regard to Rules 70(2) and 70a of its Rules of Procedure, |
decides to open interinstitutional negotiations on the basis of the following mandate:
MANDATE
Amendment 1
Draft regulation
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Modification |
|
1a. Points out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal constitutes only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the Multiannual Financial Framework for the years 2014-2020; |
Amendment 2
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
1b. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on ‘Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe’ (1); reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the TFEU, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; calls on the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its political priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5 % compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union's agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; |
Amendment 3
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 4
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 5
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
Parliament has already called for coherence in EU actions in regard to internal and external security, in the Report on the Internal Security Strategy.
Amendment 6
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 7
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Justification
Crime’s infiltration into the legitimate economy is one of the factors distorting the internal market.
Amendment 8
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Justification
Crime’s infiltration into the legitimate economy is one of the factors distorting the internal market.
Amendment 9
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Justification
The economic crisis calls for flexible and innovative responses in order to be just as effective as before in fighting organised crime.
Amendment 10
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
Trafficking in human beings and child sexual exploitation are among the worst forms of serious and organized crime. They should be mentioned specifically in this Recital.
Amendment 11
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 12
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 13
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Justification
The EU has committed itself to protecting the rights of the child. These efforts need to be made visible in the implementation and execution of this Regulation.
Amendment 14
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
Implementation of the Union budget by shared management should be the exception and not the rule (cf. Article 55 of the Financial Regulation).
Amendment 15
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Justification
Lessons learned from the mid-term review and consulting stakeholders suggest that shared management should be more results-oriented and a common regulatory framework should be drawn up.
Amendment 16
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
The changes are in line with changes proposed for Article 10.
Amendment 17
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 18
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 19
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 b (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 20
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 c (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 21
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 d (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 22
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 e (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 23
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 f (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 24
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 g (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 25
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 h (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 26
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
deleted |
Justification
This Regulation does not constitute a development of the Schengen acquis.
Amendment 27
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
deleted |
Justification
This Regulation does not constitute a development of the Schengen acquis.
Amendment 28
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
deleted |
Justification
This Regulation does not constitute a development of the Schengen acquis.
Amendment 29
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 — point b
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 30
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 — point d
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 31
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 — point f
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 32
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 — point h
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
The proposed reformulation makes the text a great deal clearer.
Amendment 33
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 — point i
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 34
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 2 — point a — paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 35
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 2 — point a — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
The achievement of this objective shall be measured against indicators such as, inter alia, the number of cross-border-joint operations and the number of best practice documents and events organised. |
deleted |
Justification
A specific amendment describing indicators to measure achievement of the objectives has been proposed.
Amendment 36
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 2 — point b a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
Amendment 37
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 2 — point b — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
The achievement of this objective shall be measured against indicators such as, inter alia, the number of tools put in place and/or further upgraded to facilitate the protection of critical infrastructure by Member States in all sectors of the economy and the number of threat and risk assessments produced at the level of the Union. |
deleted |
Justification
A specific amendment describing indicators to measure achievement of the objectives has been proposed..
Amendment 38
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
3. To achieve these objectives, the Instrument shall contribute to the following operational objectives by promoting and developing : |
3. To achieve these objectives, the instrument shall contribute to the following operational objectives: |
Justification
The change is in line with other amendments to Article 3(3).
Amendment 39
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — point a
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 40
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — point b
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 41
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — point c
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
||||
|
(This amendment also applies to points (d) to (g); technical adjustments to said points should be made.) |
Amendment 42
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — point d
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
Witnesses and victims of crime do not only need protection and support but also need to be identified as early as possible. The EU has committed itself to protecting the rights of the child. These efforts need to be made visible in the implementation and execution of this Regulation.
Amendment 43
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 — paragraph 3 — point g
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
No funds should be used as conduits for the financing of measures or practices that have not first been approved by a political agreement at the level of the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 44
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
Article 3a |
||||
|
Indicators |
||||
|
The achievement of the specific objectives referred to in Article 3 shall be assessed on the basis of clearly pre-defined, transparent and measurable performance indicators, in particular such as: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Member States shall provide the Commission with the necessary information that is required for the assessment of the achievements, as measured against the indictors. |
Amendment 45
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point a
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 46
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point c
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
No funds should be used as conduits for the financing of measures or practices that have not first been approved by a political agreement at the level of the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 47
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
Coordination as regards actions in and in relation to third countries shall be ensured by the Commission and the Member States, together with the European External Action Service, as set out in Article 3(4a) of Regulation (EU) No …/2013 [the Horizontal Regulation]. |
Amendment 48
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the Financial Framework . |
2. The annual appropriations for the Fund shall be authorised by the budgetary authority without prejudice to the provisions of the Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 and the Interinstitutional Agreement of xxx/201z between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management . |
Amendment 49
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 4
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
4. The budget allocated under the Instrument shall be implemented under shared management in accordance with Article 55(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [New Financial Regulation], with the exception of the Union actions referred to in Article 7, the technical assistance referred to in Article 8(1) and the emergency assistance referred to in Article 9 . |
4. The budget allocated under the Instrument shall be implemented by direct and indirect management (the Union actions referred to in Article 7, the technical assistance referred to in Article 8(1) and the emergency assistance referred to in Article 9) or under shared management in accordance with Article 55(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [New Financial Regulation]. |
Justification
Implementation of the Union budget by shared management should be the exception and not the rule (cf. Article 55 of the Financial Regulation).
Amendment 50
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 4 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
4a. In accordance with Article 317 TFEU, the ultimate responsibility for implementing the Union budget lies with the Commission. |
Justification
According to Article 317 TFEU, the ultimate responsibility for implementing the Union budget rests with the Commission.
Amendment 51
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
5. The global resources shall be used indicatively as follows: |
5. Without prejudice to the prerogatives of the budgetary authority, the global resources shall be used as follows: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Amendment 52
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 7
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
7. The countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis shall participate in the Instrument, in accordance with this Regulation. |
deleted |
Justification
This Regulation does not constitute a development of the Schengen acquis.
Amendment 53
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 — paragraph 8
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
8. Arrangements shall be concluded on the financial contributions by these countries to the Instrument and the supplementary rules necessary for such participation, including provisions ensuring the protection of the Union's financial interests and the power of audit of the Court of Auditors. The financial contributions from these countries shall be added to the global resources available from the Union budget referred to in paragraph 1. |
deleted |
Justification
This Regulation does not constitute a development of the Schengen acquis.
Amendment 54
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. Under the national programmes to be examined and approved by the Commission pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [Horizontal Regulation], Member States shall focus on projects addressing the strategic Union priorities listed in the annex to this Regulation. |
2. Under the national programmes to be examined and approved by the Commission pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [Horizontal Regulation], Member States shall implement projects addressing the strategic Union priorities listed in the annex to this Regulation. |
Justification
The national programmes should be focused on projects that address the strategic priorities of the Union listed in the Annex to the regulation.
Amendment 55
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 — paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. At the Commission's initiative, this Instrument may be used to finance transnational actions or actions of particular interest to the Union (‘Union actions’) concerning the general, specific and operational objectives set out in Article 3. |
1. At the Commission's initiative, this Instrument may be used to finance transnational actions or actions of particular interest to the Union (‘Union actions’) concerning the general, specific and operational objectives set out in Article 3. All such actions shall be in compliance with the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as with the Union legal provisions on data protection and privacy. The European Data Protection Supervisor, the Fundamental Rights Agency and other relevant supervisory agencies and bodies may assess these actions to ensure compliance. |
Justification
Independent supervision ought to guarantee the compliance of all actions with fundamental rights including privacy rights and compliance to data protection standards.
Amendment 56
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 — paragraph 2 — introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. To be eligible for funding, Union actions shall be in line with the priorities identified in relevant Union strategies, programmes, threat and risk assessments, and support in particular: |
2. To be eligible for funding, Union actions shall be in line with the priorities identified and agreed by the European Parliament and the Council in relevant Union strategies, programmes, threat and risk assessments, and support in particular: |
Justification
No funds should be used as conduits for the financing of measures or practices that have not first been approved by a political agreement at the level of the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 57
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 — paragraph 2 — point c
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Justification
No funds should be used as conduits for the financing of measures or practices that have not first been approved by a political agreement at the level of the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 58
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 — paragraph 2 — point f
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 59
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 — paragraph 1 — introductory part
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
1. EUR 564 million shall be allocated to the Member States indicatively as follows: |
1. The resources for national programmes shall be distributed as follows: |
Amendment 60
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 — paragraph 1 — point a
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 61
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 — paragraph 1 — point c
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 62
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 — paragraph 1 — point d
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
deleted |
Amendment 63
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 — paragraph 1 — point e
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 64
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. The delegation of powers referred to in this Regulation shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 7 years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation]. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. |
2. The delegation of powers referred to in this Regulation shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 7 years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation]. |
Amendment 65
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 — paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to this Regulation shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council. |
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to this Regulation shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 3 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 3 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council. |
Amendment 66
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 — paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. |
deleted |
Justification
No reference is made to Article 12(2) anywhere else in the text in question.
Amendment 67
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 — paragraph 5
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
5. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council, by 31 December 2015, a report on the results achieved and on qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementation of Council Decision 2007/125/JHA for the period 2011 to 2013. |
5. The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council, by 31 December 2015, a report on the results achieved and on qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementation of Council Decision 2007/125/JHA for the period 2011 to 2013. In this report, the European Commission shall provide concrete evidence, if available, of the complementarity and synergies achieved between the EU funds and the Members States' budgets and of the triggering effects on Member States of the EU budget in achieving the objectives set in the Council Decision 2007/125/JHA. |
Amendment 68
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
|
Article 15a |
|
Evaluation |
|
By 31 December 2017 at the latest, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives set out in this Regulation. |
Justification
As part of a results-based approach, a mid-term review should be conducted of the operation of this regulation.
Amendment 69
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 — paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
On the basis of a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council shall review this Regulation by 30 June 2020 at the latest. |
On the basis of a proposal from the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council shall review this Regulation by 1 June 2020 at the latest. |
Amendment 70
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 — point 1
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||||
|
|
Amendment 71
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 — new point after last point
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment |
||
|
|
(1) Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0266.