This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014FA0129
Case F-129/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Dybman v EEAS (Civil Service — EEAS staff — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary penalty — Criminal proceedings in progress at the time of the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Identical facts submitted to the Appointing Authority and to the criminal court — Breach of Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations)
Case F-129/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Dybman v EEAS (Civil Service — EEAS staff — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary penalty — Criminal proceedings in progress at the time of the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Identical facts submitted to the Appointing Authority and to the criminal court — Breach of Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations)
Case F-129/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Dybman v EEAS (Civil Service — EEAS staff — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary penalty — Criminal proceedings in progress at the time of the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Identical facts submitted to the Appointing Authority and to the criminal court — Breach of Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations)
OJ C 262, 10.8.2015, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.8.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 262/41 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Dybman v EEAS
(Case F-129/14) (1)
((Civil Service - EEAS staff - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary penalty - Criminal proceedings in progress at the time of the adoption of the disciplinary penalty - Identical facts submitted to the Appointing Authority and to the criminal court - Breach of Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations))
(2015/C 262/55)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Pierre Dybman (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz, D. Verbeke and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the EEAS to remove the applicant from his post without reducing his pension rights.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service to remove Mr Dybman from his post without reducing his pension rights; |
|
2. |
Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Dybman. |