Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0022

    Case T-22/13 and T-23/13: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Senz Technologies BV v OHIM — Impliva (Umbrellas) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing umbrellas — Grounds for invalidity — Disclosure of earlier design — American patent as earlier design — Circles specialised in the sector concerned — Informed user — Degree of attention of an informed user — Fashion accessories — Degree of freedom of the designer — Individual character — Different overall impression — Invalidity proceedings)

    OJ C 221, 6.7.2015, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.7.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 221/8


    Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Senz Technologies BV v OHIM — Impliva (Umbrellas)

    (Case T-22/13 and T-23/13) (1)

    ((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing umbrellas - Grounds for invalidity - Disclosure of earlier design - American patent as earlier design - Circles specialised in the sector concerned - Informed user - Degree of attention of an informed user - Fashion accessories - Degree of freedom of the designer - Individual character - Different overall impression - Invalidity proceedings))

    (2015/C 221/10)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Senz Technologies BV (Delft (Netherlands)) (represented initially by: W. Hoyng and C. Zeri, and subsequently by W. Hoyng and I. de Bruijn, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: F. Mattina, and subsequently by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Impliva BV (Mijdrecht (Netherlands)) (represented by: C. Gielen and A. Verschuur, lawyers)

    Re:

    Actions brought against two decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 September 2012 (Cases R 2453/2010-3 and R 2459/2010-3), in relation to invalidity proceedings between Impliva BV and Senz Technologies BV.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 September 2012 (Cases R 2453/2010-3 and R 2459/2010-3);

    2.

    Orders Impliva BV to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs of Senz Technologies BV;

    3.

    Orders Senz Technologies to bear two thirds of its own costs;

    4.

    Orders OHIM to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.


    Top