This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0171
Case T-171/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Shape of a turnbuckle) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trademark — Shape of a turnbuckle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-171/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Shape of a turnbuckle) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trademark — Shape of a turnbuckle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-171/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Shape of a turnbuckle) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trademark — Shape of a turnbuckle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 395, 10.11.2014, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 395/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Shape of a turnbuckle)
(Case T-171/12) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trademark - Shape of a turnbuckle - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2014/C 395/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Peri GmbH (Weißenhorn, Germany) (represented by: J. Dönch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2012 (Case R 1209/2011-1), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign in the shape of a turnbuckle as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders Peri GmbH to pay the costs. |