This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C:2013:344:TOC
Official Journal of the European Union, C 344, 23 November 2013
Official Journal of the European Union, C 344, 23 November 2013
Official Journal of the European Union, C 344, 23 November 2013
ISSN 1977-091X doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.344.eng |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 344 |
|
English edition |
Information and Notices |
Volume 56 |
Notice No |
Contents |
page |
|
IV Notices |
|
|
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
Court of Justice of the European Union |
|
2013/C 344/01 |
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 336, 16.11.2013 |
|
|
General Court |
|
2013/C 344/02 |
Assignment of Judges to Chambers |
|
|
V Announcements |
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS |
|
|
Court of Justice |
|
2013/C 344/03 |
Case C-189/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Discrepancies between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special scheme to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘customer’ — Exclusion from the special scheme of certain sales to the public — Mention in the invoice of an amount of deductible VAT not related to the input tax due or paid — Overall determination of the taxable amount for a given period — Not compatible) |
|
2013/C 344/04 |
Case C-193/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Discrepancies between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special scheme to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘customer’) |
|
2013/C 344/05 |
Case C-221/11: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — Leyla Ecem Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Additional Protocol — Article 41(1) — ‘Standstill’ clause — Visa requirement for admission to the territory of a Member State — Freedom to provide services — The right of a Turkish national to enter a Member State in order to visit a family member and, potentially, to receive services) |
|
2013/C 344/06 |
Case C-236/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’) |
|
2013/C 344/07 |
Case C-267/11 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeals — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system — Allocation of allowances for the Republic of Latvia — Period from 2008 to 2012) |
|
2013/C 344/08 |
Case C-269/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Discrepancies between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special scheme to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘customer’) |
|
2013/C 344/09 |
Case C-293/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’) |
|
2013/C 344/10 |
Case C-296/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Discrepancies between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’) |
|
2013/C 344/11 |
Case C-309/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special regime for travel agencies — Differences between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special regime to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘client’) |
|
2013/C 344/12 |
Case C-369/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Directive 2001/14/EC — Articles 4(1) and 30(3) — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Levying of charges — Infrastructure fees — Independence of infrastructure managers) |
|
2013/C 344/13 |
Case C-373/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Panellinios Sindesmos Viomikhanion Metapiisis Kapnou v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon, Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon (Request for a preliminary ruling — Assessment of validity — Common Agricultural Policy — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Additional payment for specific types of farming and quality production — Discretion granted to the Member States — Discrimination — Articles 32 EC and 34 EC) |
|
2013/C 344/14 |
Case C-418/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck, Austria) — TEXDATA Software GmbH (Company law — Freedom of establishment — Eleventh Directive 89/666/EEC — Disclosure of accounting documents — Branch of a capital company established in another Member State — Pecuniary penalty in the event of failure to disclose within the prescribed period — Right to effective judicial protection — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty) |
|
2013/C 344/15 |
Case C-431/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (Coordination of social security systems — EEA Agreement — Proposal for an amendment — Council decision — Choice of legal basis — Article 48 TFEU — Article 79(2)(b) TFEU) |
|
2013/C 344/16 |
Case C-435/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — CHS Tour Services GmbH v Team4 Travel GmbH (Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair commercial practices — Sales brochure containing false information — Treated as ‘misleading commercial practice’ — Case in which the trader cannot be criticised for any breach of the duty of diligence) |
|
2013/C 344/17 |
Case C-450/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Discrepancies between language versions — National legislation providing for the application of the special scheme to persons other than travellers — Concepts of ‘traveller’ and ‘customer’) |
|
2013/C 344/18 |
Case C-476/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Glennie Kristensen v Experian A/S (Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 21(1) — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 6(1) and (2) — Occupational pension scheme — Increases in the amount of contributions on the basis of age) |
|
2013/C 344/19 |
Case C-509/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ÖBB-Personenverkehr AG (Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Rail passengers’ rights and obligations — Article 17 — Compensation in the event of a delay — Excluded in the event of force majeure — Whether permissible — First subparagraph of Article 30(1) — Powers of the national body responsible for the enforcement of the regulation — Whether it is possible to require the rail carrier to amend its conditions governing passenger compensation) |
|
2013/C 344/20 |
Case C-539/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione Siciliana — Italy) — Ottica New Line di Accardi Vincenzo v Comune di Campobello di Mazara (Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Public health — Opticians — Regional legislation making the establishment of new opticians’ shops subject to authorisation — Demographic and geographical limitations — Justification — Appropriateness for attaining the objective pursued — Coherency — Proportionality) |
|
2013/C 344/21 |
Case C-546/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from Højesteret — Denmark) — Dansk Jurist- og Økonomforbund, acting on behalf of Erik Toftgaard v Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet (Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 6(1) and (2) — Refusal to grant availability pay to civil servants who have reached the age of 65 and are entitled to a pension) |
|
2013/C 344/22 |
Case C-583/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 — Trade in seal products — Restrictions on importing and marketing such products — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Right of natural or legal persons to institute proceedings — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Concept of ‘regulatory act’ — Legislative act — Fundamental right to effective judicial protection) |
|
2013/C 344/23 |
Case C-609/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH v centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeals — Regulations (EC) Nos 207/2009 and 2868/95 — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark CENTROTHERM — Genuine use — Concept — Evidence — Sworn statement — Article 134(1) to (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — General Court’s powers of review — Scope of pleas in law and forms of order sought by an intervener) |
|
2013/C 344/24 |
Case C-610/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG (Appeal — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark CENTROTHERM — Genuine use — Evidence — Sworn statement — Burden of proof — Examination of the facts by OHIM of its own motion — Additional evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 15, 51 and 76 — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 40(5)) |
|
2013/C 344/25 |
Case C-622/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Pactor Vastgoed BV (Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 13C and 20 — Supply of immovable property — Right to opt for taxation — Right to deduction — Adjustment of deductions — Recovery of sums due following adjustment of a VAT deduction — Taxable person liable for payment — Taxable person other than the person who initially applied the deduction and who is extraneous to the taxed transaction which gave rise to the deduction) |
|
2013/C 344/26 |
Case C-625/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG), SNF SAS v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission (Appeal — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Articles 57 and 59 — Substances subject to authorisation — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Inclusion on the candidate list of substances — Publication — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Article 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Date from which that time limit must be calculated in the case of an action brought against a decision published only on the internet — Legal certainty — Effective judicial protection) |
|
2013/C 344/27 |
Case C-626/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands (Appeal — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Articles 57 and 59 — Substances subject to authorisation — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Inclusion on the candidate list of substances — Publication of the list on the ECHA website — Action for annulment brought prior to that publication — Admissibility) |
|
2013/C 344/28 |
Case C-661/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — Martin y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV (Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5 — Consent on the part of the proprietor of a trade mark to the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with that mark — Consent given in a situation where there is shared use — Possibility for that proprietor to put an end to the shared use and regain the exclusive use of its mark) |
|
2013/C 344/29 |
Case C-668/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Alliance One International, Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Infringement of Article 81 EC — Whether unlawful conduct of a subsidiary attributable to its parent company — Deterrent effect — Equal treatment — Cooperation — Obligation to state reasons — Mitigating circumstances) |
|
2013/C 344/30 |
Case C-679/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Alliance One International Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Infringement of Article 81 EC — Whether unlawful conduct of a subsidiary attributable to its parent company — Obligation to state reasons — Fundamental rights — Deterrent effect — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation — Unlimited jurisdiction — Ne ultra petita — Right to a fair hearing) |
|
2013/C 344/31 |
Case C-5/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social no 1 de Lleida — Spain) — Marc Betriu Montull v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (Social policy — Directive 92/85/EEC — Protection of the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding — Article 8 — Maternity leave — Directive 76/207/EEC — Equal treatment for male and female workers — Article 2(1) and (3) — Right to leave for employed mothers after the birth of a child — Possible use by an employed mother or an employed father — Non-employed mother who is not covered by a State social security scheme — No right to leave for employed father — Biological father and adoptive father — Principle of equal treatment) |
|
2013/C 344/32 |
Case C-32/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 2 of Badajoz — Spain) — Soledad Duarte Hueros v Autociba SA, Automóviles Citroën España SA (Directive 1999/44/EC — Rights of the consumer in the event of lack of conformity in a product — Minor nature of that lack of conformity — Rescission of the contract not possible — Powers of the national courts) |
|
2013/C 344/33 |
Case C-56/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) v European Commission, Lexmark International Technology SA (Appeal — Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Ink cartridge market — Decision rejecting a complaint — Lack of Community interest — Low probability of proving the existence of an infringement of Article 82 EC — Degree of seriousness of the infringement alleged) |
|
2013/C 344/34 |
Case C-59/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — BKK Mobil Oil Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV (Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair commercial practices — Scope — Misleading information circulated by a health insurance fund which is part of the statutory social security system — Fund established as a public law body) |
|
2013/C 344/35 |
Case C-86/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative — Luxembourg) — Adzo Domenyo Alokpa, Jarel Moudoulou, Eja Moudoulou v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration (Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of residence of a third-country national who is a direct relative in the ascending line of Union citizens who are minor children — Union citizens born in a Member State other than that of which they are nationals and who have not made use of their right of freedom of movement — Fundamental rights) |
|
2013/C 344/36 |
Case C-94/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per le Marche — Italy) — Swm Costruzioni 2 SpA, Mannocchi Luigino DI v Provincia di Fermo (Public contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Economic and financial standing — Technical and/or professional ability — Articles 47(2) and 48(3) — Right of an economic operator to rely on the capacities of other entities — Article 52 — Certification system — Public works contracts — National legislation requiring possession of a qualification certificate corresponding to the category and the value of the works covered by the contract — Prohibition on reliance on the certificates of more than one entity for works within the same category) |
|
2013/C 344/37 |
Case C-109/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Laboratoires Lyocentre v Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Medical devices — Directive 93/42/EEC — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Right of the competent national authority to classify as a medicinal product for human use a product marketed in another Member State as a medical device bearing a CE marking — Applicable procedure) |
|
2013/C 344/38 |
Case C-113/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Donal Brady v Environmental Protection Agency (Environment — Directive 75/442/EEC — Slurry produced in a piggery and stored there pending its transfer to farmers who use it as fertiliser on their land — Classification as ‘waste’ or ‘by-product’ — Conditions — Burden of proof — Directive 91/676/EEC — Failure to transpose — Personal liability of the producer as to compliance by those farmers with European Union law concerning the management of waste and fertilisers) |
|
2013/C 344/39 |
Case C-115/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — French Republic v European Commission (Appeal — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Community structural assistance in the region of Martinique — Reduction of financial assistance — Public works contracts — Compliance of operations with provisions of European Union law — Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts — Directive 93/37/EEC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘direct subsidy’ — Concept of ‘facilities intended for sports, recreation and leisure’) |
|
2013/C 344/40 |
Case C-120/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Bariatrix Europe Inc. SAS (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account) |
|
2013/C 344/41 |
Case C-121/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account) |
|
2013/C 344/42 |
Case C-122/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account) |
|
2013/C 344/43 |
Case C-140/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (Freedom of movement for persons — Union Citizenship — Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of residence for more than three months — Article 7(1)(b) — Person no longer having worker status — Person in possession of a retirement pension — Having sufficient resources not to become a burden on the ‘social assistance system’ of the host Member State — Application for a special non-contributory cash benefit — Compensatory supplement intended to augment a retirement pension — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 3(2) and 70 — Competence of the Member State of residence — Conditions for granting — Legal right to reside on the national territory — Compliance with European Union law) |
|
2013/C 344/44 |
Case C-157/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Salzgitter Mannesmann Handel GmbH v SC Laminorul SA (Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 34(3) and (4) — Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State — Situation whereby that judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in that Member State involving the same cause of action and between the same parties) |
|
2013/C 344/45 |
Case C-170/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Peter Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction — Matters relating to tort, delict and quasi-delict — Copyright — Material support reproducing a protected work — Placing on line — Determination of the place where the harmful event occurred) |
|
2013/C 344/46 |
Case C-172/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — EI du Pont de Nemours and Company v European Commission, DuPont Performance Elastomers LLC, DuPont Performance Elastomers SA (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct of a subsidiary to its parent company — Joint control by two parent companies — Decisive influence — Joint and several liability — Limitation period — Legitimate interest) |
|
2013/C 344/47 |
Case C-179/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — The Dow Chemical Company v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct of a subsidiary to its parent company — Joint control by two parent companies — Decisive influence — Rights of defence — Increase in the fine — Deterrent effect) |
|
2013/C 344/48 |
Case C-195/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Industrie du bois de Vielsalm & Cie (IBV) SA v Région wallonne (Directive 2004/8/EC — Scope — Cogeneration and high efficiency cogeneration — Article 7 — Regional support scheme providing for the grant of ‘green certificates’ to cogeneration plants — Grant of a larger number of green certificates to cogeneration plants processing principally forms of biomass other than wood or wood waste — Principle of equality and non-discrimination — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) |
|
2013/C 344/49 |
Joined Cases C-216/12 and C-217/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg)) — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Fjola Hliddal (C-216/12), Pierre-Louis Bornand (C-217/12) (Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation — Swiss nationals residing in Switzerland and working in Luxembourg — Grant of a parental leave allowance — Concept of a ‘family benefit’) |
|
2013/C 344/50 |
Case C-251/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce, Brussels — Belgium) — Christian Van Buggenhout and Ilse Van de Mierop, acting as liquidators in the insolvency of Grontimmo SA v Banque Internationale à Luxembourg SA (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Insolvency proceedings — Article 24(1) — Honouring an obligation ‘for the benefit of a debtor that is subject to insolvency proceedings’ — Payment made to a creditor of that debtor) |
|
2013/C 344/51 |
Case C-282/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul — Portugal) — ITELCAR — Automóveis de Aluguer Lda v Fazenda Pública (Free movement of capital — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Interest paid by a resident company on funds lent by a company established in a non-member country — Existence of ‘special relations’ between those companies — Thin capitalisation rules — No right of deduction in relation to interest on the part of the overall debt regarded as excessive — Interest deductible if paid to a company resident in the national territory — Tax evasion and avoidance — Wholly artificial arrangements — Arm’s length terms — Proportionality) |
|
2013/C 344/52 |
Case C-283/12: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Serebryannay vek EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 2(1)(c), 26, 62 and 63 — Chargeable event — Reciprocal supplies of services — Transactions for consideration — Basis of assessment for a transaction in the event of consideration in the form of services — Assignment by a natural person to a company of the right to use and to let to third parties immoveable property in exchange for that company’s services to improve and furnish the property) |
|
2013/C 344/53 |
Case C-297/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Laufen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Gjoko Filev, Adnan Osmani (Area of freedom, security and justice — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 11(2) — Return decision coupled with an entry ban — Length of the entry ban restricted to five years in principle — National legislation providing for an entry ban of unlimited duration in the absence of an application for a limitation — Article 2(2)(b) — Third-country nationals subject to return as a criminal law sanction or as a consequence of a criminal law sanction — Non-application of the directive) |
|
2013/C 344/54 |
Case C-298/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Confédération paysanne v Ministre de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche (Agriculture — Common agricultural policy — Single payment scheme — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Calculation of payment entitlement — Setting the reference amount — Reference period — Article 40(1), (2) and (5) — Exceptional circumstances — Farmers under agri-environmental commitments according to Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 and Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Determination of the right to revalorisation of the reference amount — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Equal treatment between farmers) |
|
2013/C 344/55 |
Case C-306/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Spedition Welter GmbH v Avanssur SA (Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles and enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 21(5) — Claims representative — Authority to accept service of judicial documents — National rule making the validity of that service conditional on the express grant of an authority to accept it — Interpretation in conformity with Union law) |
|
2013/C 344/56 |
Case C-317/12: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Criminal proceedings against Daniel Lundberg (Road transport — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Obligation to install recording equipment — Derogations in respect of the non-commercial carriage of goods — Concept — Carriage of goods by a private individual as part of his leisure activity as an amateur rally driver, financed in part by sponsorship from third parties) |
|
2013/C 344/57 |
Case C-321/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — F. van der Helder, D. Farrington v College voor zorgverzekeringen (Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 28(2)(b) — Sickness insurance benefits — Entitlement to an old-age pension in several Member States — Residence in another Member State — Provision of benefits in kind in the State of residence — Burden of the cost of benefits — Member State ‘legislation’ to which the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time — Concept) |
|
2013/C 344/58 |
Case C-322/12: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — État belge v GIMLE SA (Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC — Article 2(3) — Principle that a true and fair view must be given — Article 2(5) — Obligation to depart from that principle — Article 32 — Valuation method based on historical cost — Purchase price manifestly lower than the real value) |
|
2013/C 344/59 |
Case C-336/12: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S (Request for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Principle of equal treatment — Restricted procedure — Contract notice — Requirement for a copy of the most recent published balance sheet to be enclosed with the application — Copies of balance sheets not enclosed with some candidates’ applications — Right of the contracting authority to ask those candidates to provide copies of those balance sheets after the deadline for filing applications) |
|
2013/C 344/60 |
Case C-353/12: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid for Ixfin SpA — Aid which is illegal and incompatible with the internal market — Recovery — Non-performance) |
|
2013/C 344/61 |
Case C-386/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Proceedings initiated by Siegfried János Schneider (Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Scope — Legal capacity of natural persons — Exclusive jurisdiction in matters relating to rights in rem in immovable property — Scope — Non-contentious proceedings concerning the right of a person who has been placed under guardianship and is domiciled in a Member State to dispose of immovable property situated in another Member State) |
|
2013/C 344/62 |
Case C-492/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé (Freedom of movement for persons — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Directive 2005/36/EC — Recognition of professional qualifications — Dental profession — Specific nature and distinction from the medical profession — Common training) |
|
2013/C 344/63 |
Case C-579/12 RX-II: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — European Commission v Guido Strack (Review of the judgment of the General Court in Case T-268/11 P — Civil service — Commission decision refusing to carry over paid annual leave not taken by an official during the reference period because of long term sick leave — Article 1e(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 of Annex V to those Regulations — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Right to paid annual leave — Principle of the social law of the European Union — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effect on the unity and consistency of European Union law) |
|
2013/C 344/64 |
Case C-573/11 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2013 — ClientEarth v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeals — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Action for annulment manifestly inadmissible — Grounds of the appeal manifestly unfounded) |
|
2013/C 344/65 |
Case C-34/12 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2013 — Idromacchine Srl, Alessandro Capuzzo, Roberto Capuzzo v European Commission (Appeal — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Action for damages — Commission decision to initiate a formal investigation procedure — Prejudicial statements — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) |
|
2013/C 344/66 |
Case C-356/13: Action brought on 26 June 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland |
|
2013/C 344/67 |
Case C-430/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) lodged on 29 July 2013 — Ilona Baradics and Others v QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited Magyarországi Fióktelepe, Magyar Állam |
|
2013/C 344/68 |
Case C-440/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 2 August 2013 — Croce Amica One Italia Srl v Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU) |
|
2013/C 344/69 |
Case C-443/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat in Tirol (Austria) lodged on 7 August 2013 — Ute Reindl, MPREIS Warenvertriebs GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Innsbruck |
|
2013/C 344/70 |
Case C-445/13 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2013 by Voss of Norway ASA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 28 May 2013 in Case T-178/11: Voss of Norway ASA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) |
|
2013/C 344/71 |
Case C-451/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 12 August 2013 — Gigaset AG v SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH, SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG |
|
2013/C 344/72 |
Case C-453/13: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 12 August 2013 — The Queen on application of Newby Foods Ltd v Food Standards Agency |
|
2013/C 344/73 |
Case C-457/13 P: Appeal brought on 12 August 2013 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 30 May 2013 in Case T-454/10: Associazione Nazionale degli Industriali delle Conserve Alimentari Vegetali (Anicav), Agrupación Española de Fabricantes de Conservas Vegetales (Agrucon) v European Commission |
|
2013/C 344/74 |
Case C-458/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2013 — Andreas Grund acting as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of SR-Tronic GmbH, and Others v Nintendo Co. Ltd. and Nintendo of America Inc. |
|
2013/C 344/75 |
Case C-459/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 19 August 2013 — Milica Široká v Úrad verejného zdravotníctva Slovenskej republiky |
|
2013/C 344/76 |
Case C-463/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 August 2013 — Stanley International Betting Ltd and Stanleybet Malta Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato |
|
2013/C 344/77 |
Case C-468/13 P: Appeal brought on 28 August 2013 by MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 27 June 2013 in Case T-367/12: MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) |
|
2013/C 344/78 |
Case C-471/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 2 September 2013 — Peter Link v Condor Flugdienst GmbH |
|
2013/C 344/79 |
Case C-477/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 5 September 2013 — Hans Angerer v Eintragungsausschuss bei der Bayerischen Architektenkammer |
|
2013/C 344/80 |
Case C-479/13: Action brought on 6 September 2013 — European Commission v French Republic |
|
2013/C 344/81 |
Case C-488/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Тargоvishtki оkrazhеn sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 September 2013 — Parva Investitsionna Banka AD, UniKredit Bulbank AD, Siyk Faundeyshan LLS v Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost АD, Insolvency administrator of Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost АD |
|
2013/C 344/82 |
Case C-491/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 13 September 2013 — Mohamed Ali Ben Alaya v Federal Republic of Germany |
|
2013/C 344/83 |
Case C-492/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 September 2013 — ‘Traum’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno osiguritelna praktika’ — grad Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihodite |
|
2013/C 344/84 |
Case C-493/13: Action brought on 12 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia |
|
2013/C 344/85 |
Case C-498/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simboulio tis Epikratias lodged on 16 September 2013 — Agrooikosystimata EPE v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon, Ipourgos Αgrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon, Region of Thessaly |
|
2013/C 344/86 |
Case C-502/13: Action brought on 18 September 2013 — European Commission v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg |
|
2013/C 344/87 |
Case C-505/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 September 2013 — Levent Redzheb Yumer v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na NAP — Varna |
|
2013/C 344/88 |
Case C-506/13 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2013 by Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro AE against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2013 in Case T-552/11 Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/89 |
Case C-508/13: Action brought on 23 September 2013 — Republic of Estonia v European Parliament, Council of the European Union |
|
2013/C 344/90 |
Case C-521/13 P: Appeal brought on 1 October 2013 by Think Schuhwerk GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2013 in Case T-208/12 Think Schuhwerk GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) |
|
2013/C 344/91 |
Case C-245/12: Order of the President of the Court of 23 July 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland |
|
2013/C 344/92 |
Case C-310/12: Order of the President of the Court of 20 August 2013 — European Commission v Hungary |
|
2013/C 344/93 |
Case C-544/12: Order of the President of the Court of 23 July 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland |
|
2013/C 344/94 |
Case C-610/12: Order of the President of the Court of 23 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Giessen — Germany) — Johannes Peter v Bundeseisenbahnvermögen |
|
|
General Court |
|
2013/C 344/95 |
Case T-545/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2013 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the first authorisation of the placing on the market of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ — Partial refusal of access — Risk of an adverse effect on the commercial interests of a natural or legal person — Article 4(5) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Overriding public interest — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 6(1) of Regulation No 1367/2006 — Directive 91/414/EEC) |
|
2013/C 344/96 |
Case T-167/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2013 — Council v AY (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 promotion procedure — Consideration of comparative merits — Professional development — Success at examinations in the training programme for AST function group officials in the certification procedure for access to the AD function group — Distortion of evidence) |
|
2013/C 344/97 |
Case T-285/12: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2013 — Cartoon Network v OHIM — Boomerang TV (BOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark BOOMERANG — Earlier Community figurative mark BoomerangTV — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) |
|
2013/C 344/98 |
Case T-554/11: Order of the General Court of 1 October 2013 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Action for annulment — Financing by the European Union of certain projects in Tunisia, in the framework of the EuropeAid programme — Development of an integrated IT system for the Tunisian judiciary — Recovery by the Commission of debts payable to Tunisia by a third party — Debit note — Acts inseparable from the contract — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissible) |
|
2013/C 344/99 |
Case T-153/12: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Microsoft v OHIM — Sky IP International (SKYDRIVE) (Community trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate) |
|
2013/C 344/00 |
Case T-397/13 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2013 — Tilly-Sabco v Commission (Interim measures — Agriculture — Export refunds — Poultrymeat — Regulation fixing the refunds at zero — Application for stay of execution — Lack of urgency — Weighing up of interests) |
|
2013/C 344/01 |
Case T-407/13: Action brought on 30 July 2013 — Al Assad v Council |
|
2013/C 344/02 |
Case T-408/13: Action brought on 30 July 2013 — Mayaleh v Council |
|
2013/C 344/03 |
Case T-431/13: Action brought on 19 August 2013 — Métropole Gestion v OHIM — Metropol (METROPOL) |
|
2013/C 344/04 |
Case T-440/13: Action brought on 12 August 2013 — ‘Millano’ Krzysztof Kotas v OHIM (shape of boxes of chocolates) |
|
2013/C 344/05 |
Case T-473/13: Action brought on 3 September 2013 — G-Star Raw v OHIM — PepsiCo (PEPSI RAW) |
|
2013/C 344/06 |
Case T-478/13: Action brought on 3 September 2013 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE) |
|
2013/C 344/07 |
Case T-480/13: Action brought on 30 August 2013 — You-View.tv/OHMI — YouView TV (YouView+) |
|
2013/C 344/08 |
Case T-483/13: Action brought on 10 September 2013 — Oikonomopoulos v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/09 |
Case T-484/13: Action brought on 9 September 2013 — Lumene v OHIM (THE YOUTH EXPERTS) |
|
2013/C 344/10 |
Case T-491/13: Action brought on 11 September 2013 — Perfetti Van Melle Benelux v OHIM — Kraft Foods Global Brands (TRIDENT PURE) |
|
2013/C 344/11 |
Case T-494/13: Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Sales & Solutions v OHIM — Inceda Holding (watt) |
|
2013/C 344/12 |
Case T-495/13: Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Sales & Solutions v OHIM — Inceda Holding (Watt) |
|
2013/C 344/13 |
Case T-496/13: Action brought on 16 September 2013 — McCullough v Cedefop |
|
2013/C 344/14 |
Case T-497/13: Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Boston Scientific Neuromodulation v OHIM (PRECISION SPECTRA) |
|
2013/C 344/15 |
Case T-498/13: Action brought on 16 September 2013 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU) |
|
2013/C 344/16 |
Case T-499/13: Action brought on 9 September 2013 — nMetric v OHIM (SMARTER SCHEDULING) |
|
2013/C 344/17 |
Case T-505/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Stichting Sona and Nao v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/18 |
Case T-509/13: Action brought on 19 September 2013 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile-Vertriebs v OHIM — IIC (NORTHWOOD) |
|
2013/C 344/19 |
Case T-519/13: Action brought on 25 September 2013 — Leder & Schuh International v OHIM — Epple (VALDASAAR) |
|
2013/C 344/20 |
Case T-520/13: Action brought on 25 September 2013 — Philip Morris Benelux/Commission |
|
2013/C 344/21 |
Case T-527/13: Action brought on 30 September 2013 — Italy v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/22 |
Case T-538/13: Action brought on 10 October 2013 — Verein Natura Havel and Vierhaus v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/23 |
Case T-542/13: Action brought on 2 October 2013 — Netherlands v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/24 |
Case T-544/13: Action brought on 7 October 2013 — Dyson v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/25 |
Case T-557/12: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2013 — RiskMetrics Solutions v OHIM — (RISKMANAGER) |
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
|
2013/C 344/26 |
Case F-116/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2013 — Wahlström v Frontex (Civil service — Temporary agent — Appraisal report — Duty to state reasons — Annual dialogue with the reporting officer — Setting objectives) |
|
2013/C 344/27 |
Case F-81/13: Action brought on 3 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/28 |
Case F-83/13: Action brought on 4 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission |
|
2013/C 344/29 |
Case F-87/13: Action brought on 13 September 2013 — ZZ v Parliament |
|
EN |
|