Ten dokument pochodzi ze strony internetowej EUR-Lex
Dokument 62014CN0032
Case C-32/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár
Case C-32/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár
Case C-32/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár
OJ C 102, 7.4.2014, str. 16—17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.4.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 102/16 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár
(Case C-32/14)
2014/C 102/22
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Fővárosi Törvényszék
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.
Defendant: Attila Sugár
Questions referred
1. |
Does a procedure of a Member State comply with Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC (1) if, under that procedure, in the event of a breach by the consumer of an obligation contained in a document in due form drawn up by a notary, the other party to the contract avoids inter partes proceedings before a court and asserts its claim to the amount it indicates by issuing what is known as an enforcement clause, without any examination being possible of the unfairness of a term of the underlying contract? |
2. |
In such a procedure may the consumer request the annulment of the enforcement clause already issued on the basis that there was no examination of the unfairness of a term of the underlying contract, whereas, according to the judgment in Case C-472/11, in court proceedings the court must inform the consumer if it finds that a term is unfair? |
(1) Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts; OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.