Wybierz funkcje eksperymentalne, które chcesz wypróbować

Ten dokument pochodzi ze strony internetowej EUR-Lex

Dokument 62014CN0032

Case C-32/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár

OJ C 102, 7.4.2014, str. 16—17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.4.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/16


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 January 2014 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. v Attila Sugár

(Case C-32/14)

2014/C 102/22

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.

Defendant: Attila Sugár

Questions referred

1.

Does a procedure of a Member State comply with Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC (1) if, under that procedure, in the event of a breach by the consumer of an obligation contained in a document in due form drawn up by a notary, the other party to the contract avoids inter partes proceedings before a court and asserts its claim to the amount it indicates by issuing what is known as an enforcement clause, without any examination being possible of the unfairness of a term of the underlying contract?

2.

In such a procedure may the consumer request the annulment of the enforcement clause already issued on the basis that there was no examination of the unfairness of a term of the underlying contract, whereas, according to the judgment in Case C-472/11, in court proceedings the court must inform the consumer if it finds that a term is unfair?


(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts; OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


Góra