Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0452

    Case C-452/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 12 August 2013 — Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning

    OJ C 325, 9.11.2013, p. 14–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 325, 9.11.2013, p. 13–14 (HR)

    9.11.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 325/14


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 12 August 2013 — Germanwings GmbH v Ronny Henning

    (Case C-452/13)

    2013/C 325/25

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Landesgericht Salzburg

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Germanwings GmbH

    Defendant: Ronny Henning

    Question referred

    What time is relevant for the term ‘time of arrival’ used in Articles 2, 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91: (1)

    (a)

    the time that the aircraft lands on the runway (‘touchdown’);

    (b)

    the time that the aircraft reaches its parking position and the parking brakes are engaged or the chocks have been applied (‘in-block time’);

    (c)

    the time that the aircraft door is opened;

    (d)

    a time defined by the parties in the context of party autonomy.


    (1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.


    Top