EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0315
Case T-315/12: Action brought on 13 July 2012 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiators for heating)
Case T-315/12: Action brought on 13 July 2012 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiators for heating)
Case T-315/12: Action brought on 13 July 2012 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiators for heating)
OJ C 273, 8.9.2012, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.9.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 273/21 |
Action brought on 13 July 2012 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiators for heating)
(Case T-315/12)
2012/C 273/35
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro and M. Balestriero, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2012 in Case R 953/2011-3 and, thereby, declare that Community design No 000 169 370-0002 owned by TUBES RADIATORI Srl is valid, in so far as it is new and has individual character; |
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs, in accordance with Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the Eurpopean Communities of 2 May 1991. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Radiators for heating — Community design No 169 370-0002
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Antrax It Srl
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Breach of Articles 4 and 9 of the Regulation on Community designs (CDR), in particular the ground for invalidity referred to in Article 25(1)(b) CDR, on the basis of lack of individual character for the purpose of Article 6(1)(b) CDR
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community design invalid
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Breach of Articles 4, 5 and 6 of Regulation No 6/2002