EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0350
Case T-350/09: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — ICO Satellite v Commission (Actions for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Absence of excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-350/09: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — ICO Satellite v Commission (Actions for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Absence of excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-350/09: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — ICO Satellite v Commission (Actions for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Absence of excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 273, 8.9.2012, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.9.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 273/8 |
Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — ICO Satellite v Commission
(Case T-350/09) (1)
(Actions for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Absence of excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)
2012/C 273/12
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ICO Satellite Ltd (Slough, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Tupper, Solicitor, D. Anderson QC, and D. Scannell, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Van Liedekerke and K. Platteau, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and G. Kimberley, acting as Agents), and Solaris Mobile Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: J. Wheeler, Solicitor, and A. Robertson, Barrister)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
2. |
ICO Satellite Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
3. |
The Council of the European Union and Solaris Mobile Ltd shall bear their own costs. |