This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0418
Case T-418/11 P: Appeal brought on 3 August 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 June 2011 in Case F-49/10, De Nicola v EIB
Case T-418/11 P: Appeal brought on 3 August 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 June 2011 in Case F-49/10, De Nicola v EIB
Case T-418/11 P: Appeal brought on 3 August 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 June 2011 in Case F-49/10, De Nicola v EIB
OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 42–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.9.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 282/42 |
Appeal brought on 3 August 2011 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 June 2011 in Case F-49/10, De Nicola v EIB
(Case T-418/11 P)
2011/C 282/79
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by L. Isloa, lawye)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
Vary the judgment delivered on 28 June 2011 by the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-49/10, concerning: |
— |
the annulment of the decision in the e-mail of 11 May 2010, in so far as the EIB refused to allow the administrative procedure to be completed and obstructed the attempted amicable settlement of the matter, rejecting by implication the claim for reimbursement of medical expenses in the sum of EUR 3 000,00; |
— |
order the EIB to reimburse the sum of EUR 3 000 incurred by the appellant for laser therapy treatment prescribed for him and carried out in Italy, together with interest, monetary inflation and the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of his claims, the appellant submits as follows:
A. |
The facts:
|
B. |
The application for annulment
|
C. |
The order as to costs
|