This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0367
Case T-367/09: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission (Action for failure to act — Request to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Action for damages — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-367/09: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission (Action for failure to act — Request to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Action for damages — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-367/09: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission (Action for failure to act — Request to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Action for damages — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.9.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 282/18 |
Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission
(Case T-367/09) (1)
(Action for failure to act - Request to act - Manifest inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2011/C 282/33
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Tecnoprocess Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Majoli, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Bordes, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action, first, for a declaration that the European Commission and the European Union delegation to Nigeria have failed to act and, secondly, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered as a result of that failure to act
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed in part as inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
|
2. |
Tecnoprocess Srl shall pay the costs. |