This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0135
Case T-135/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety — Technical examination — Discretion of the CPVO — Objections — Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94)
Case T-135/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety — Technical examination — Discretion of the CPVO — Objections — Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94)
Case T-135/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety — Technical examination — Discretion of the CPVO — Objections — Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94)
OJ C 301, 6.11.2010, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.11.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer)
(Case T-135/08) (1)
(Plant varieties - Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety - Technical examination - Discretion of the CPVO - Objections - Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94)
2010/C 301/42
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Schniga GmbH (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: B. Kiewiet and M. Ekvad, Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, interveners before the General Court: Elaris SNC (Angers, France), and Brookfield New Zealand Ltd (Havelock North, New Zealand) (represented by: M. Eller, lawyer)
Re:
ACTION against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 21 November 2007 (Cases A 003/2007 and A 004/2007), concerning the grant of a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer plant variety.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 21 November 2007 (Cases A 003/2007 and A 004/2007); |
|
2. |
Orders the CPVO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Schniga GmbH; |
|
3. |
Orders Elaris SNC and Brookfield New Zealand Ltd to bear their own costs. |