EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009TN0029

Case T-29/09: Action brought on 20 January 2009 — Easycamp v OHIM — Oase Outdoors (EASYCAMP)

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.3.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/50


Action brought on 20 January 2009 — Easycamp v OHIM — Oase Outdoors (EASYCAMP)

(Case T-29/09)

(2009/C 69/109)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Easycamp BV (Amersfoort, The Netherlands) (represented by: C. Beijer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Oase Outdoors ApS (Give, Denmark)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 October 2008 in joined cases R 853/2007-1 and R 916/2007-1;

Allow the applicant to continue to use the Community trade mark — application No 3 188 943 for services in class 43; and

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘EASYCAMP’, for services in classes 39, 41 and 43

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited: Danish trade mark registration No 199 903 355 of the figurative mark ‘easycamp’ for goods in classes 18, 20, 22, 24, 25 and 28; German trade mark registration No 39 910 614 of the figurative mark ‘easycamp’ for goods in classes 18, 20, 22, 24, 25 and 28; Benelux trade mark registration No 944 316 of the figurative mark ‘easycamp’ for goods in classes 18, 20, 22, 24, 25 and 28; United Kingdom trade mark registration No 2 191 370 of the figurative mark ‘easycamp’ for goods in classes 18, 20, 22, 24, 25 and 28; The unregistered sign ‘easy camp’ used in Denmark and the United Kingdom.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially allowed the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeals

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.


Top