EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/66
Case T-339/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Clotuche v Commission (Officials — Reassignment of a Director as a Principal Adviser — Interest of the service — Equivalence of posts — Reorganisation of Eurostat — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
Case T-339/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Clotuche v Commission (Officials — Reassignment of a Director as a Principal Adviser — Interest of the service — Equivalence of posts — Reorganisation of Eurostat — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
Case T-339/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Clotuche v Commission (Officials — Reassignment of a Director as a Principal Adviser — Interest of the service — Equivalence of posts — Reorganisation of Eurostat — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 30–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/30 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Clotuche v Commission
(Case T-339/03) (1)
(Officials - Reassignment of a Director as a Principal Adviser - Interest of the service - Equivalence of posts - Reorganisation of Eurostat - Action for annulment - Action for damages)
(2007/C 82/66)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Gabrielle Clotuche (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P.-P. Van Gehuchten, J. Sambon, G. Demez and P. Reyniers, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, agents)
Re:
First, an application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 9 July 2003 to reassign the applicant from a post as Director to a post as Principal Adviser and of the Commission's decision of 1 October 2003 reorganising Eurostat, in so far as it does not include any measure reassigning the applicant as a Director, and, secondly, an application for compensation for the non-material harm suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
orders the Commission to pay the applicant the sum of EUR one by way of damages for breach of administration; |
|
2. |
dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
orders the Commission to bear its own costs inclusive of those of the proceedings for interim relief before the Court of First Instance, and one fifth of the costs incurred by the applicant inclusive of those of the proceedings for interim relief before the Court of First Instance; |
|
4. |
orders the applicant to bear four fifths of its own costs inclusive of those of the proceedings for interim relief before the Court of First Instance. |