This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52007XX0329(01)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 144th meeting on 25 October 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez — Rapporteur: Sweden
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 144th meeting on 25 October 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez — Rapporteur: Sweden
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 144th meeting on 25 October 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez — Rapporteur: Sweden
OJ C 72, 29.3.2007, p. 42–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.3.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 72/42 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 144th meeting on 25 October 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez
Rapporteur: Sweden
(2007/C 72/19)
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified operation is a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the EC Merger Regulation No 132/2004 of the Commission (1). |
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definitions of the relevant product markets, as concerns gas in Belgium, are:
|
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definitions of the relevant geographic markets, as concerns gas in Belgium, are:
The majority of the Member States agrees, a minority disagrees concerning point (f). |
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definitions of the relevant product markets, as concerns gas in France, are:
|
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation as concerns gas in France, the definitions of the relevant geographic markets, are based on the regional balancing zones and that each of them constitutes a relevant geographic market for all product markets as identified in question 4. |
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definitions of the relevant product markets, as concerns electricity in Belgium, are:
|
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definitions of the relevant geographic markets, as concerns electricity in Belgium, are:
|
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that for the purpose of assessing the present operation the definition of the relevant product market, as concerns district heating in France, is:
|
9. |
|
10. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proposed concentration is likely to result in a significant impediment to effective competition in the common market or in a substantial part of it and the EEA for the following markets: Belgium:
France:
|
11. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments are sufficient to remove the significant impediments to competition in the markets identified in Question 10. The majority of the Member States agrees, a minority disagrees. |
12. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, subject to full compliance with the commitments offered by the parties, and considered all commitments together, the proposed concentration does not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or in a substantial part of it, in particular as a result of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, within the meaning of Article 2(2) and 8(2) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement. The majority of the Member States agrees, a minority disagrees. |
13. |
The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion |