Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/281/26

Case C-100/06: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2003/66/EC — Energy labelling of household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combinations — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

OJ C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 17–17 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

18.11.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/17


Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-100/06) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/66/EC - Energy labelling of household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combinations - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 281/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and J. Hottiaux, Agents)

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/66/EC of 3 July 2003 amending Directive 94/2/EC implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to energy labelling of household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combinations (OJ 2003 L 170, p. 10)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2003/66/EC of 3 July 2003 amending Directive 94/2/EC implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to energy labelling of household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combinations, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

2.

Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 86, 08.04.2006


Top